W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Copy to Clipboard - ambush and abuse by javascript

From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:58:26 -0400
Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-Id: <43001C15-E137-4CF4-A1C7-126FAFA8CBDC@la-grange.net>
To: Paul Libbrecht <paul@activemath.org>
Paul,

Le 9 juin 2010 à 02:08, Paul Libbrecht a écrit :
> Please tell us before which question you intend to evaluate. E.g. I do not think it's easy to request comparison of the usefulness of the service-rich copy as long a one such is not implemented.

User testing is not a questions survey or not exactly. 
The intent is to observe people doing stuff and write down their reactions.

Would you have additional scenarios that would help refine the study?



So User scenarios to be tested so far.

# scenario 1
Cut and Paste a piece of text on the Web  in an email.
The text has been modified with the simple URI and a read more.

# scenario 2 
Cut and Paste a piece of text on the Web  in an email.
The text has been modified with the simple URI and a read more + a tracking code.

# scenario 3
Cut and Paste a piece of text on the Web in a context 
with direct visibility of the other person (no possibility to edit).
The text has been modified with the simple URI.






-- 
Karl Dubost
Montréal, QC, Canada
http://www.la-grange.net/karl/
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 23:59:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:06 UTC