- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:54:12 +0100
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Paul Cotton" <paul.cotton@microsoft.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 11:32:21 +0100, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:36:21 +0100, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> > wrote: >> On Dec 15, 2009, at 3:00 PM, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: >> >>> [...] endorse the proposed disposition of HTML WG issue-59 in >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Dec/0249.html , >>> i.e. >>> the class=author view and the informative reference guide, provided the >>> relaxng is appended to the informative reference guide, which will be >>> published as a Working Draft and taken to Last Call [...] >> >> I don't think I can commit on behalf of the Working Group to publish >> the document as Last Call, nor do I think the Working Group itself can >> credibly pre-commit to that step. [...] > > Non-normative documents are published as WG Note, not as Last Call > documents. Apparently there is plenty of precedence for publishing them as W3C REC in the end (e.g. RDF and OWL primers). Forgot about that. Not sure whether it is worth it. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 4 January 2010 10:54:59 UTC