W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2010

Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection + address bar

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:36:43 -0500
Message-ID: <760bcb2a1002241036i6c2915bbn1cd3657bcaab89ff@mail.gmail.com>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Your call, Noah. It's possible discussion would be profitable, but
people haven't had much time to read it and react to it, and there is
no urgency, so I'd say hold off for a week or two, unless we've got an
empty agenda.

Jonathan

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:09 PM,  <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Jonthan:  I'd like to ask you the same question I asked Ashok about his
> action.  I think your draft represents real progress, and it seems to be
> ready for discussion.  I note, however, that you have not marked
> ACTION-348 as pending review.  Do you recommend I schedule discussion on
> this week's telcon, or would you prefer to go further in email and discuss
> later?  Thank you.
>
> Noah
>
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
> 02/23/2010 06:24 PM
>
>        To:     www-tag@w3.org
>        cc:     (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
>        Subject:        Re: ACTION-348 some draft text re redirection +
> address bar
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
> wrote:
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/02/redirects-and-address-bar.txt
>>
>> Written in the style of a blog post, and making use of
>> state-of-the-art theory (such as it is) of http semantics.
>>
>> If this gets review and approval of some kind (especially from TimBL,
>> who has been the vocal campaigner on this question) I'll htmlify and
>> post it and be done with this action. Not sure what else to do.
>
> Well there is one more thing someone could do, assuming this
> pessimistic draft is viewed favorably, which is to bring the problem
> to the attention of the HTTP WG, which might choose to issue a
> security warning and/or change the wording for 307 et al.
>
> Jonathan
>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 18:37:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:19 GMT