On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 19:40 +0000, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > [...] I don't think we can usually talk > about something being "more secure" or "less secure" without bounding the > range of use cases, the range of threats or information leakage modes that > are a concern, etc. I agree; I was only responding in kind to the test claim that Ashok put out there: Non-public URIs provide a weak level of security that is held to be adequate for some usecases. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 8 February 2010 22:26:35 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:19 GMT