On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 14:50 -0800, ashok malhotra wrote: > Hi Larry: > This is useful. > Non-public URIs provide a weak level of security that is held to be > adequate for some usecases. > I wonder if there is disagreement with the above statement. I disagree. The unguessable URI pattern can be made about as secure as you like; in particular, as secure or more secure than passwords+cookies. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Monday, 8 February 2010 15:32:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:19 GMT