W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > August 2010

RE: FW: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates

From: Carr, Wayne <wayne.carr@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 14:32:32 -0700
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
CC: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Message-ID: <E3280858FA94444CA49D2BA02341C9830110292590@orsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Paul,

Issue 41 Proposals 1, 2, and 4 were all from Rob Ennals as part of his work representing Intel Corporation in W3C. Rob has left Intel.  In the 4th proposal, Rob writes "This is currently my preferred resolution on ISSUE-41, in preference to my other two proposals."  

The first 2 proposals were 2 different attempts to form compromise positions that attempted to reflect the interests of both sides.  Out of the discussions that came from that, the final proposal was formed.

  Wayne

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com]
>Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 12:06 PM
>To: Noah Mendelsohn
>Cc: Tim Berners-Lee; www-tag@w3.org; Sam Ruby; Maciej Stachowiak; Carr, Wayne
>Subject: RE: FW: ISSUE-41: extensibility change proposal advocates
>
>>1) Your change proposals 1, 2, and 4 all originate from the same author
>(Rob Ennals), who believes now that 4 is a better solution than 1 or 2.
>
>See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Aug/0063.html for
>Intel's explanation that is related to your observation above.
>
>Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
>
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 21:33:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:25 GMT