On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 11:37 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: [...] > I agree that is what IETF MIME registration policy requires, but that > doesn't seem to be what RFC2854 says on the face of it. It obsoletes > the previous RFCs and only mentiones HTML4.01 and XHTML1 as applicable > specifications. That was the way I read it, but I gather there are more generous/less narrow ways to read it. > If that is considered an error in RFC2854, then I have > no problem with fixing it, so long as everyone is clear what is > happening. Maybe "error" is too strong... but in any case, it's clear to me that this* is a considered change/fix/clarification. * see Ian's msg of Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:06:09 +0000 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:16:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:20 GMT