- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:16:53 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, public-html@w3.org, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 11:37 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: [...] > I agree that is what IETF MIME registration policy requires, but that > doesn't seem to be what RFC2854 says on the face of it. It obsoletes > the previous RFCs and only mentiones HTML4.01 and XHTML1 as applicable > specifications. That was the way I read it, but I gather there are more generous/less narrow ways to read it. > If that is considered an error in RFC2854, then I have > no problem with fixing it, so long as everyone is clear what is > happening. Maybe "error" is too strong... but in any case, it's clear to me that this* is a considered change/fix/clarification. * see Ian's msg of Tue, 20 Apr 2010 21:06:09 +0000 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:16:56 UTC