- From: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:31:58 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Sam <rubys@intertwingly.net>
After the TAG F2F, it seemed to me that I need to do a somewhat better job of tracking the HTML WG issues of interest to the TAG, and of being sure that the HTML chairs are aware of our likely next steps, etc. With that in mind, I opened up the HTML WG issues status list referenced by Paul Cotton at our meeting [1], and I identified the following as ones where I either know for a fact that the TAG is active, or else suspect that we have an interest: - html-versioning: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/4 - rel-ownership: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/27 - decentralized-extensibility: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/41 - urls-webarch: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/56 (how is thi s related to urls-terminology: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/78 ?) - representation-vs-resource: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/81 - profile-disambiguation: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/82 - legacy-doctypes: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/84 - sniffing-optional: http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/104 TAG members, does this list look right to you? If not, please suggest corrections. If you are inclined to remind me of any pertinent work you are doing with the HTML WG, associated TAG actions, etc., so much the better (don't bother in cases where it's obvious, e.g. our action 404 [4] is clearly about HTML Issue 27). Thanks. Noah [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/404
Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 21:32:30 UTC