W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2009

TAG issue review

From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 01:30:11 -0700
To: "noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8B62A039C620904E92F1233570534C9B0118DC469E0A@nambx04.corp.adobe.com>
In response to an administrative request to review issues, I thought
I would send this more publicly: 

I see three TAG that I am listed as shepherd on:

ISSUE-63: Metadata Architecture
   I think the first follow-up action is to get other TAG member's
   review of the proposed framework.
   A second follow-up would be to review current and past W3C and other
  work on metadata and see how it fits (or doesn't fit) into the
  Using that, we might start developing a metadata architecture
  overview as an adjunct or update to AWWW? But we'd want to
  review this.

ISSUE-27: " Should W3C specifications start promoting IRIs?"
  I want to rename this issue as "How should W3C specifications
  refer to IRIs" since I don't think the binary yes/no question
  captures it. And the work to align W3C and IETF specs in this
  area is in progress and should be the source of action items.

ISSUE-41: "designing extensible languages and for
    handling versioning?"
  I'd put Noah's overview of DE and the JAR and LMM (and Raman?)
    work on versioning and payoffs as further actions.

Received on Friday, 16 October 2009 08:30:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:04 UTC