W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2009

conneg, HTTPbis, and generic resources (status check)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:36:01 -0600
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <1259134561.4804.1005.camel@pav.lan>
Larry, when you and I talked about your conneg stuff in HTTP,
I thought there was no relevant follow-up, but now I see
Henry has an action that follows on:

ACTION-231 on Larry Masinter: Draft replacement for \"how to use conneg
\" stuff in HTTP spec - due 2009-11-18 - pending review
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/231

ACTION-232 on Henry S. Thompson: Follow-up to Hausenblas once there's a
draft of HTTPbis which has advice on conneg - due 2009-12-01 - open

Did the HTTPbis WG accept your changes?

I can follow my nose from your action to an HTTPbis ticket...
  http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/81

but I'm not sure how to read the status.

I see:

Changed 7 weeks ago by mnot@pobox.com ¶
      * severity set to Active WG Document 
      * milestone changed from unassigned to 08 

Changed 12 days ago by julian.reschke@gmx.de ¶
      * milestone changed from 08 to 09 


and "(reopened design)" at the top... so it looks like
the WG hasn't decided. But I don't really know how the HTTPbis
WG makes/records decisions.

I guess it's clear enough that there isn't an Internet Draft
with the new wording... unless I'm missing something.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 07:36:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:18 GMT