W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2009

Re: Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) LC spec addresses ISSUE-30 (binaryXML-30)?

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:05:59 -0500
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF71CA271C.A35867ED-ON85257679.00167DDA-85257679.001685F1@lotus.com>
Dan Connolly wrote:

> If I can get a second (and no objections) by email,
> that would put us in a good position to record
> a decision quickly at our next meeting.

Second.  Thanks.

Noah

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
11/24/2009 10:32 PM
 
        To:     www-tag@w3.org
        cc:     (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
        Subject:        Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) LC spec addresses 
ISSUE-30  (binaryXML-30)?


At our Nov meeting in Santa Clara, we pretty much polished
off the binaryXML issue...
  http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/11/06-minutes.html#item04

We actioned Noah to close the loop with the EXI WG (which he has done;
cf http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/328 )
but we didn't record a decision to close the issue.
I don't see any reason not to.

That is: I propose that the EXI spec of 19 Sep
addresses TAG issue binaryXML-30.
http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/30

If I can get a second (and no objections) by email,
that would put us in a good position to record
a decision quickly at our next meeting.

Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0
W3C Working Draft 19 September 2008
NOTE: This is the Last Call working draft.
This version:
        http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-exi-20080919/
Latest version:
        http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 25 November 2009 04:06:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:18 GMT