W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > November 2009

Re: f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62

From: ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:12:05 -0800
Message-ID: <4AFDCBA5.9020900@oracle.com>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Here are some pointers:
Link header draft: 
Site-meta draft http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-site-meta-03
LRDD draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-discovery-03
All the best, Ashok

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> Thank you Ashok, this looks like a very good start.  It would be very 
> helpful to me if in the next week or two you would, working with Dan while 
> I am gone, try to evolve this closer to the form of a F2F agenda item. 
> Substantively, I think that means relating this to existing open actions, 
> and if appropriate opening new ones.  Also, it would be very helpful if 
> you could give links to current versions of references, and suggest to 
> other TAG members which should be required reading in advance of our 
> discussion, and which are provided just for reference.
> Right now, I'm assuming your work on this and Larry's look at issue 63 
> will be more or less orthogonal, but please do keep an eye out for any 
> areas that might require coordination.  Thank you.
> Noah
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn 
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
> ashok malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
> Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
> 11/13/2009 08:43 AM
> Please respond to ashok.malhotra
>         To:     "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
>         cc:     (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
>         Subject:        f2f Agenda Planning -- Issue 62
> Issue 62 is about Uniform Access to Metadata. 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/62
> My take on the landscape is that we now have several mechanisms for 
> access to Metadata
> (Link Header, Link, Site-Meta, RDFa) which we are reasonably satisfied 
> with and what we need is
> a document that ties them all together and explains what should be used 
> in what situations with examples, etc.
> Jonathan had taken an action to start work on such a document.  See 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/282
> If we could have a draft to discuss at the f2f, that would be wonderful.
> As I told some of you, I ran into Mark Nottingham at the TPAC and we 
> talked about a document
> to tie the threads of Metadata access together.  Mark said he was 
> interested in writing such a document but
> was constrained by time availability etc.  I have not followed up with 
> Mark because, I think, the TAG should
> first decide what we want to do in the area.
Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 21:14:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:33:04 UTC