- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:02:44 -0500
- To: "Larry Masinter" <LMM@acm.org>
- Cc: "'Eran Hammer-Lahav'" <eran@hueniverse.com>, "'Dan Connolly'" <connolly@w3.org>, <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>, "'URI'" <uri@w3.org>
On Jun 26, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Larry Masinter wrote: > # They aren't being treated differently. The normal syntax for naming > # something in RDF is a URI reference with a fragid attached. The > use of > # a fragID cancels any assumptions that the URIreference denotes > something connected with the HTTP protocol. > > How does it do that? http-range-14, as I understand it. > > # This is how RDF manages to > # refer to galaxies, chemical elements, people, etc.. > > Sounds like this is only in the context of RDF. Well, true, fragids have a different meaning in HTML. But this rule seems to work smoothly throughout the SWeb formalisms, which are all the referential uses of URIrefs on the Web. Pat > > Larry > -- > http://larry.masinter.net > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 26 June 2009 21:03:31 UTC