Pat Hayes wrote: > ... > hope I do not misrepresent anyone here.) Apparently, therefore, two > people both quite expert in reading the HTTP spec do not interpret the > phrase "requested resource" in the same way, leaving me and I suspect > others in a state of complete confusion. > ... We have multiple issues open with respect to cleaning up that terminology. I would recommend to delay any new discussion until we're done with that (which *should* be the -08 versions of the drafts). BR, JulianReceived on Friday, 31 July 2009 20:41:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 31 July 2009 20:41:47 GMT