W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > July 2009

Re: FYI: new draft of site-meta; now well-known

From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:05:18 -0700
Message-ID: <1cb725390907130105x217ff5cbr3dcdc25e94eb7b20@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Mark asked me to re-raise my concern on the list:

The leading dot seems like it will cause confusion for Unix newbies.
For example, users could create the directory in public-html and watch
it "disappear". -well-known would not have that problem. Or
"web-well-known".

Also:

B.1.  Aren't well-known locations bad for the Web?

   They are, but for various reasons -- both technical and social --
   they are commonly used, and their use is increasing.  This memo
   defines a "sandbox" for them, to reduce the risks of collision and to
   minimise the impact upon pre-existing URIs on sites.

I'd suggest that if the authors think that well-known locations are a
bad thing then they should point potential implementers towards the
better thing.

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Mark Nottingham<mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> See:
>  http://bit.ly/48bdmV
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 13 July 2009 08:06:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:14 GMT