Re: FYI: new draft of site-meta; now well-known

Mark asked me to re-raise my concern on the list:

The leading dot seems like it will cause confusion for Unix newbies.
For example, users could create the directory in public-html and watch
it "disappear". -well-known would not have that problem. Or
"web-well-known".

Also:

B.1.  Aren't well-known locations bad for the Web?

   They are, but for various reasons -- both technical and social --
   they are commonly used, and their use is increasing.  This memo
   defines a "sandbox" for them, to reduce the risks of collision and to
   minimise the impact upon pre-existing URIs on sites.

I'd suggest that if the authors think that well-known locations are a
bad thing then they should point potential implementers towards the
better thing.

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Mark Nottingham<mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> See:
>  http://bit.ly/48bdmV
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>

Received on Monday, 13 July 2009 08:06:01 UTC