W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > January 2009

Re: rel=CURIE in RDFa, but rel=URI in Link:

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:05:15 +0000 (UTC)
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0901231205070.14270@hixie.dreamhostps.com>

On Fri, 12 Sep 2008, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:27:33 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> wrote:
> > Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> > > > HTML5, as currently drafted, already allows URIs in link/@rel to the
> > > > same extent @xmlns takes a URI. That is, using a URI as a rel token is
> > > > allowed (if the extension designer registers it on the wiki), but the
> > > > token is compared as a string--not as a URI.
> > >  Also, note that such tokens (e.g. stylesheet) are compared in an ASCII
> > > case-insensitive manner.
> > 
> > ...where does it say that?
> 
> HTML5 does not say so currently, but that's a bug. HTML4 has said that for
> over a decade though:
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/struct/links.html#adef-rel

Fixed.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 12:05:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:11 GMT