Yikes! http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395 should have obsoleted and replaced BCP 35 http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp35 instead of being accepted as a new BCP 115. I don't know why I didn't notice this! I'll see if I can get this fixed. It was clearly a mistake. RFC 3986 does *not* contain an explicit reference to 2717, it intentionally references BCP 35 just to allow the process to be updated, as it was. Larry -- http://larry.masinter.netReceived on Saturday, 17 January 2009 16:07:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:21 GMT