W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2009

Re: ACTION-363 - XRD correspondence with RDF

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:09:25 -0600
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-ID: <1261073365.3504.17591.camel@pav.lan>
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 17:45 +0000, Toby Inkster wrote:
[...]
> 2. Link templates - these I've mapped to a literal datatype. However,
> because they're literals, they can't be used as RDF subjects in
> subsequent statements, which means that if their media type, title, etc
> are in the XRD, that information is lost from the RDF. A bnode mapping
> might be a possibility.

Did you look at POWDER?

e.g.

Example 1-1: A simple IRI Set definition

<iriset>
  <includehosts>example.org</includehosts>
  <includepathstartswith>/foo</includepathstartswith>
</iriset>


http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-powder-grouping-20090901/


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Thursday, 17 December 2009 18:09:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:18 GMT