Ian Hickson wrote: > Yeah sorry about that, I didn't realise the bug that I had marked it as a > duplicate of hadn't gotten the boilerplate. > > The text you were _supposed_ to get is: > > -----8<----- > EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you > are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to > CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to > reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the > issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest > keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or > you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For > more details, see this document: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html > -----8<----- > > ...and the presence of the TrackerIssue keyword means that the escalation > process is ongoing. No problem, much appreciated. Thank you. I'm sure I read about the bugzilla/tracker split when the policy was announced by the chairs, but I confess I did not commit it all to memory. Thanks for the clarification and the quick response. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------Received on Monday, 14 December 2009 15:21:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:18 GMT