- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:27:19 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Karl Dubost wrote: > DanC, > > Le 9 déc. 2009 à 23:55, Dan Connolly a écrit : >> But as I say, I'm sympathetic to the position that (outside of the Semantic Web) this >> abstraction just makes talking about all this stuff more complicated. > > > What do you think about the explanation given in CHIPs (Common HTTP Implementation Problems) > http://www.w3.org/TR/chips/#uri Well, it needs to be both updated and fixed...: "Note also that the HTTP Etag can be shared by identical resources that have different URIs. For example, if http://mirror1.example.org/foo and http://mirror2.example.org/foo share the same ETags, you can then deduct that those are equivalent resources." This is incorrect. Besides that, it may have some overlap with the much quoted "Cool URIs don't change"; so maybe this should be consolidated into a single document... Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2009 12:27:59 UTC