"3. The host-meta Document Format The host-meta document uses the XRD 1.0 document format as defined by [OASIS.XRD-1.0], which provides a simple and extensible XML-based schema for describing resources." -- http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hammer-hostmeta-04 This pretty clearly overlaps with POWDER. I wonder why it wasn't caught at CR or even much earlier. Did the W3C POWDER WG neglect to engage a relevant part of the community? Is a significant community producing things like site copyright policies with POWDER? If so, and Host-Meta with XRD gets deployed, then consumers will have to support both formats. That seems like a pretty clear standardization failure. Copyright in particular isn't shown in the primer, but lots of other nearby stuff is: # How does POWDER work in the real world? * Trustmarks o Visual notification o Monitoring o Description authentication * Accessibility * MobileOK * Child Protection * Functional User Experience * Privileged Content * Semantics o Search o Distinguishing opinion -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/NOTE-powder-primer-20090901/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 17:52:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 November 2011 15:43:06 GMT