W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > December 2009

EXI for HTTP? Re: Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) LC spec addresses ISSUE-30 (binaryXML-30)?

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:35:12 -0500
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <BECE1DC9-1EF1-4571-905F-35DCA5B22473@w3.org>
To: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
By the way, has anyone looked at using EXI for HTTP and MIME?
Toward solving the problems of always sending the same darn HTTP  
headers...
One wouldn't normally suggest it but as Google seem to think spdy is  
better in binary, maybe a common interchange format would be a good  
idea....

On 2009-11 -25, at 05:34, Robin Berjon wrote:

> On Nov 25, 2009, at 04:32 , Dan Connolly wrote:
>> That is: I propose that the EXI spec of 19 Sep
>> addresses TAG issue binaryXML-30.
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/30
>
> Woo-hoo! Are there plans to throw a party of sorts?
>
>> Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0
>> W3C Working Draft 19 September 2008
>> NOTE: This is the Last Call working draft.
>
> Note that this is to be a CR very soon, I believe.
>
> -- 
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 5 December 2009 20:39:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:18 GMT