Re: Fwd: draft-nottingham-http-link-relation-07 progress

On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 17:01 +1100, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> FYI. Feedback appreciated (as always).

The more clear registration process ("Within at most 14 days of the
request, ...") addresses my earlier concerns. Thanks.

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
> > Date: 2 December 2009 5:00:44 PM AEDT
> > To: Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>
> > Subject: draft-nottingham-http-link-relation-07 progress
> > 
> > Based on Last Call feedback, as well as discussions with members of the HTML5 WG, I've taken another pass at this spec.
> > 
> > There's a complete change listing at the end of the spec, as well as a diff, but the biggest change is in the registry itself; it now allows extension "fields" to be registered by third parties, to aid in deploying applications that want to leverage the registry.
> > 
> > See:
> >  http://www.mnot.net/drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07.txt
> > and
> >  http://www.mnot.net/drafts/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-07-from-6.diff.html
> > 
> > Cheers,

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E