Le 4 août 2009 à 06:24, Tim Berners-Lee a écrit : >>> Basically we are adding a layer of meaning by fragmenting a >>> generic meaning: >>> From "Resource" to "Document, Thing and Service". It seems like >>> going from >>> abstract to more defined material things. This might help >>> momentarily but >>> will just push the limit to the next iteration of "abuse", the >>> next layer of >>> fragmentation. >> > > This isn't fragmentation. Hmm nothing negative in my word fragmentation. I meant Resource being specialized in terms of the context. > I am only talking about "Resource", not about other terms, > and the problem is simply that it has been used differently in > different specs and sometimes ambiguously. As in different meanings? or a generic meaning covering everything aka a Resource can be a Thing, a Resource can be a Document, a Resource can be a Service. (which is what I meant) > >> We call this "categorization". It doesn't fragment, it organizes. what I meant. >> With the organization come benefits: predictability, auditability, >> understandability. as long as we share the same understanding for the organization, yes.Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2009 19:30:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:15 GMT