- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:41:49 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: "Roy T.Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Shane McCarron wrote: > FWIW I agree with you. This only came up because the Link: header > proposal had some short relationship names in it. If the Link: header > rel values can have short names, then they should map directly to URIs They do. See <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02.html#rfc.section.3.1>. > (for sem web purposes). All we were saying is that we have such URIs > already at http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab# and Link: resolution > could use those. It could also use others - I don't mind. I think the other point Roy was making that link relations are URIs, not IRIs, so new specs that allow non-ASCII characters in link relations should deal with the information the loss when transferred as URI. BR, Julian
Received on Sunday, 28 September 2008 07:42:36 UTC