Not sure who to tell about this now, but it does seem to bear on our discussion of CURIE/URI confusion. Quoth http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#relValues : @rel a whitespace separated list of CURIEs, used for expressing relationships between two resources ('predicates' in RDF terminology); Quoth http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link- header-02.txt : Link = "Link" ":" #("<" URI-Reference ">" *( ";" link-param ) ) link-param = ( ( "rel" "=" relationship ) | ... relationship = URI-Reference | ... I was under the impression that the founding fathers meant for Link: and <link> to be compatible. We seem to have lost that possibility now, due to lack of coordination between groups working independently on extensions to HTTP and XHTML. JonathanReceived on Thursday, 11 September 2008 14:33:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:48:06 GMT