W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2008

RE: Re: TAG recommends against XRI

From: Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol) <skw@hp.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 16:12:02 +0000
To: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9674EA156DA93A4F855379AABDA4A5C611D1DCA716@G5W0277.americas.hpqcorp.net>

Hello Ray,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress
> Sent: 22 May 2008 16:53
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Re: TAG recommends against XRI
>
>
>
> One further question, if I may  ...

Certainly...

> Noah included the question:  "Also, could you let us know what steps, if any, you have
> taken towardsregistration of 'xri' as a URI scheme with the IETF?"
>
> It was an un-numbered question, and OASIS appears to have answered the
> numbered questions only, and not this one. Was there any follow-up?

Sadly not. I personally feel delinquent in that respect.

> Assuming not, what do we think the answer is?

I guess I'd prefer not to guess... but were you to press me, I think it would be explained that xri: is not a URI scheme.

> Looking at the TAG minutes http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/05/01-minutes
> this seems to still be a point of confusion.  (I think I asked the OASIS
> folks a while back "is the supposed to be a URI scheme or not, and if not,
> how would you characterize it?" and I don't think I ever got a straight answer.)

I you do find reference to a response I'd be interested in a pointer if you are able to share it.

> Thanks.
>
> --Ray

Regards,

Stuart Williams
--

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>
> To: "Bassetti, Ann" <ann.bassetti@boeing.com>; <www-tag@w3.org>
> Cc: "'Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress'" <rden@loc.gov>
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 9:24 AM
> Subject: RE: Re: TAG recommends against XRI
>
>
>
> Hello Ann,
>
> Yes... I think that is correct. Nothing further of substance.
>
> Best regards
>
> Stuart
> --
> Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road,
> Bracknell, Berks RG12
> 1HN
> Registered No: 690597 England
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]
> > On Behalf Of Bassetti, Ann
> > Sent: 21 May 2008 20:39
> > To: 'www-tag@w3.org'
> > Cc: 'Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress'
> > Subject: Re: TAG recommends against XRI
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for that reference, Dan. I do not see further mail in
> > this thread, so I presume there was not further discussion
> > between TAG and XRI TC after Gabe Wachob responded to TAG?
> >
> >   -- Ann
> >
> > Ann Bassetti
> > Web Integration Manager
> > Boeing Information Technology
> > Computing and Network Operations
> > telephone (desk):  +1.425.865.6603
> > mobile:  +1.206.218.8039
> > email:  ann.bassetti@boeing.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2008 16:16:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:57 GMT