Hi Noah, On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 9:32 PM, <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> wrote: > In section 2, I've taken your advice, and the (as yet unpublished) draft > text now reads: > > "The link could have been to an image/jpeg picture, an > application/atom+xml feed, or a document containing RDF in > application/rdf+xml data." > > So, the reference to application/xml has been replaced by a reference to > ATOM. I hope you find that to be a suitable fix. Yes, that's great, thanks. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.comReceived on Tuesday, 6 May 2008 13:41:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:15 GMT