W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2008

Re: Uniform access

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:02:08 -0400
Message-Id: <73E6FD49-705E-480C-B86B-CE4AF9419611@gmail.com>
Cc: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>, "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>


On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:47 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote:

> At the TAG face-to-face meeting in Bristol on 20 May 2008, the TAG  
> took up the issue of the appropriate use (if any) of the HTTP Link:  
> response header, with consideration of design alternatives and  
> issues as summarized in [2]. After a lively discussion, we agreed  
> as follows:
>
> "The TAG endorses http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http- 
> link-header-01.txt and standardization of the HTTP Link: header for  
> use cases such as POWDER and metadata about fixed resources, and  
> GRDDL transformation links"

Why mention of "fixed resources" specifically? Is this meant to  
supply that responses to requests about "generic resources" should  
not use link headers?

-Alan 
Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 14:03:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:58 GMT