W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2008

Re: Uniform access

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:02:08 -0400
Message-Id: <73E6FD49-705E-480C-B86B-CE4AF9419611@gmail.com>
Cc: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>, "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>, "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>

On Jun 13, 2008, at 8:47 AM, Jonathan Rees wrote:

> At the TAG face-to-face meeting in Bristol on 20 May 2008, the TAG  
> took up the issue of the appropriate use (if any) of the HTTP Link:  
> response header, with consideration of design alternatives and  
> issues as summarized in [2]. After a lively discussion, we agreed  
> as follows:
> "The TAG endorses http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http- 
> link-header-01.txt and standardization of the HTTP Link: header for  
> use cases such as POWDER and metadata about fixed resources, and  
> GRDDL transformation links"

Why mention of "fixed resources" specifically? Is this meant to  
supply that responses to requests about "generic resources" should  
not use link headers?

Received on Friday, 13 June 2008 14:03:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:57 UTC