Re: XRI vote aftermath

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress writes:

> The most perplexing aspect (to me) of this whole XRI business is the
> discussion of URI schemes.  I was sure we had established that XRI is not a
> proposed URI scheme, it is something else, a higher-level identifier, or
> something (actually I don't think it has ever been definitively
> characterized in terms of its relationship to a URI scheme.)

Actually, Gabe Wachob of the XRI TC wrote [1] as follows in a thread you
started:

 "It has always been the intention of the XRI TC to register the
  "xri:" scheme with IANA once the XRI 2.0 specification work was
  complete at OASIS, and we will now work with OASIS staff to complete
  that step."

ht

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2008May/0120.html
- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFISUJnkjnJixAXWBoRAjZSAKCCKNdRH0RHtEYPLsNol9xgd0YatgCfXJOg
Cicbbg4jfdW4CJNbEFe2fts=
=tcAe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Friday, 6 June 2008 13:58:48 UTC