On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 14:38 -0500, Shane McCarron wrote: > There is a note about XHTML here w.r.t. IANA registries that I don't > understand... DanC or someone, can you fill in the blanks? XHTML is also XML. I prefer XHTML to separate custom XML dialects for this sort of thing. But I seem to be part of a vanishing minority. > Henry S. Thompson wrote: > > DanC: News from IETF > > > > <DanC> IANA Update: Project to convert registries to XML > > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg52473.html > > > > <DanC> "In order to make the transition as smooth as possible, IANA > > will continue to maintain the legacy plain text formats until 30 > > November 2008. After this date, plain text versions will only be > > provided that are derived from the XML formats. However, implementors > > who intend to parse the contents of an IANA protocol registry should > > migrate to using the XML versions, rather than the plain text > > version." > > > > SW: Instead of text files? > > > > DC: In addition to > > ... XHTML could have killed two bullets with one stone there. . . -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29EReceived on Friday, 25 July 2008 21:34:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:18 GMT