John Cowan wrote: > Xiaoshu Wang scripsit: > > >> But if cap the size, the implication is that web >> is closed. >> > > The Web is indeed closed. There are roughly 10^79 particles in > the universe, so it can be in at most 2^(10^79) possible states. > After that, you either stop storing data or you figure out a way to > break the conservation laws. (I am neglecting quantum effects here.) > You mean one molecule of H2O is the same as two hydrogen and one oxygen? I do not understand your use of base 2 in your formula. Also, if the universe survive infinitely, the number of human identities (live and dead) will surpass whatever a number you give, no? Xiaoshu > It's like the notion that there are an infinite number of sentences in > a given language. For theoretical purposes we may postulate a grammar > that can construct arbitrarily long sentences, but in fact even if you > gabble at 100 words per minute for 150 years, which is beyond the limit > of a human lifetime, you cannot utter a sentence of more than about > 10^10 words. > > Information is inherently finite because its physical substrate is > inherently finite. > > Even if I buy your theory. There is still a fairness issue. Who will get the longest bit and who gets the shortest? Because obviously they will be treated very differently in the web. XiaoshuReceived on Tuesday, 8 January 2008 12:16:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:18 GMT