On Dec 30, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Dec 2008, Elliotte Harold wrote: >> >> I definitely believe that defining syntax, semantics, and behavior in >> one spec is a very bad idea. > > The only example I can think of where the syntax, semantics, and > behaviour > were defined in _different_ specs was the OWL specs, and my > understanding > is that that working group concluded it was a mistake. Two points. First, I don't think that the WG did conclude that this was a mistake; if anything, the contrary. Second, the OWL specs (quite deliberately) do not specify behavior at all. Pat HayesReceived on Wednesday, 31 December 2008 03:51:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:21 GMT