- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:10:14 +0100
- To: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>, "Larry Masinter" <masinter@adobe.com>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 18:57:07 +0100, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > +2 I've always understood the word in more or less Larry's sense. > However, it don't see (contra other comments) that the criteria in > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/#crec are necessarily at odds with Larry's > definition. This refers to test suites, which are collections of > examples provided by a specs authors which are used to illustrate > required or expected interoperation behaviors, such as not crashing or > delivering a certain type of response under certain conditions. The RDF > and OWL test suites, for example, consisted largely of example parsings, > entailments and non-entailments appropriate for fragments of RDF and OWL > syntax. None of this requires uniformity of the user agent's > implementation, only in certain aspects of its behavior (those required > for interoperability, in fact.) Well, if you see it like that than Ian also simply means "interoperability" as the idea is that HTML5 roughly follows the CSS 2.1 model here. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2008 19:24:42 UTC