- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:56:34 -0600
- To: public-tag-announce@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
- Cc: public-grddl-comments <public-grddl-comments@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-html-comments@w3.org, www-html <www-html@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
The TAG seeks community input on our recent decision: RESOLUTION: Close ISSUE-35 on the basis the RDFa and GRDDL provide the desired solution -- http://www.w3.org/2008/11/13-tagmem-minutes#item07 for reference: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/35 This issue was accepted Feb 2003 when we split a more general issue about the meaning of mixed-namespace documents into parts. http://www.w3.org/2003/02/06-tag-summary#mixedNamespaceMeaning-13 Discussion of the RDFinHTML issue overlaps somewhat with some related issues that remain open: The use of fragments in HTML documents that contain RDF overlaps with: ISSUE-28 fragmentInXML-28 Use of fragment identifiers in XML http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/28 And as we discussed 27 March, http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2008/03/27-minutes#item03 the use of text/html is outside the scope of the RDFa specification, and recent drafts of HTML 5 do not include the head/@profile attribute used in GRDDL. This brings up: ISSUE-54 TagSoupIntegration-54 Tag soup integration http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/54 The faithful-infoset issue postponed by the GRDDL WG http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/issues#issue-faithful-infoset is closely related to an open TAG issue: ISSUE-34 xmlFunctions-34 XML Transformation and composability (e.g., XSLT,XInclude, Encryption) http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/34 Another postponed GRDDL WG issue, issue-http-header-links http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/issues#issue-http-header-links overlaps somewhat with discussion of Link: header proposals under TAG issue-57 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/57 It is the position of the TAG that RDFa and GRDDL provide adequate mechanisms to embed RDF in web pages, despite some related open issues. We're interested to know whether members of the community agree, and if not, why not. Please let us know in a message to www-tag@w3.org (the Reply-To header field of this message directs replies there). For reference: Gleaning Resource Descriptions from Dialects of Languages (GRDDL) W3C Recommendation 11 September 2007 This Version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-grddl-20070911/ Latest Version: http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/ RDFa in XHTML: Syntax and Processing A collection of attributes and processing rules for extending XHTML to support RDF W3C Recommendation 14 October 2008 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-rdfa-syntax-20081014 Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax p.s. tracker, this is ACTION-191 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 5 December 2008 00:57:10 UTC