- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:25:48 +0100
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, John Bradley <john.bradley@wingaa.com>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, www-tag@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Julian Reschke writes:
> But <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names11/> is the namespaces
> specification for XML 1.1, right? <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names>
> (from the same date) still refers to RFC 3986 (URI).
True. However, if XML 1.0 5th edition is approved, I expect that
a new edition of XML Namespaces will be issued grandfathering in
IRI references. . .
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIrr5ckjnJixAXWBoRAhhBAJ9rKKMvvQbpWAtYETn5bv9eutOu+gCfaiyC
NJWBfuVF/JDn4HPChFAEVBE=
=bEfp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 22 August 2008 13:31:44 UTC