W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Boeing XRI Use Cases

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 09:00:55 +0200
Message-ID: <48994C27.9050003@gmx.de>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
CC: John Bradley <john.bradley@wingaa.com>, "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, www-tag@w3.org

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> John Bradely writes:
> 
>> A IRI is NOT a URI,  it would be WRONG to use a IRI in an XML 
>> document for name-spacing.
>>
>> The XML specs are clear and unambiguous use a URI.
> 
> Well, they do seem to me to be clear, but I read them differently than you 
> do I'm afraid ;-).  From the XML Namespaces 1.1 Recommendation [1]:
> 
> "Abstract: XML namespaces provide a simple method for qualifying element 
> and attribute names used in Extensible Markup Language documents by 
> associating them with namespaces identified by IRI references."
> 
> and indeed the formal definition [2] says:
> 
> "[Definition: An XML namespace is identified by an IRI reference 
> [RFC3987]; element and attribute names may be placed in an XML namespace 
> using the mechanisms described in this specification. ]"
> ...

But <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names11/> is the namespaces specification 
for XML 1.1, right? <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names> (from the same 
date) still refers to RFC 3986 (URI).

BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2008 07:01:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:19 GMT