RE: Uniform access to descriptions

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
> Sent: 09 April 2008 17:26
> To: wangxiao@musc.edu; Pat Hayes
> Cc: Jonathan Rees; www-tag@w3.org WG; Phil Archer
> Subject: RE: Uniform access to descriptions


> Tempted to answer... ok... I will... Well certainly (1) but
> what it is that is important is *not* to confuse a
> [awww:representation of [a 'thing']] with a
> [awww:representation of [a description/depiction of [a 'thing']]].

In the light of a para in Pat's most recent response:

        All that matters (to me, and I may not be exactly aligned with the TAG here)
        is the distinction between things that can send, or be, messages over wires
        (I don't really care about making this sub-distinction exact) and things
        that cannot.

I would add... "Particularly in the case of things that cannot (possibly) have webarch:representations." to my response above.


Stuart
--
Hewlett-Packard Limited registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England