Re: Uniform access to descriptions

On Apr 9, 2008, at 12:59 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:

> We have no idea. It could be anything, just as a 303 redirect tells  
> us nothing about what the URI is obliged to denote. Http-range-14 is  
> silent on both of these cases. It only specifies that in the case of  
> an unhashed URI returning a 200 response, the URI is understood to  
> denote the resource that emits the response.

So an IR is the sort of thing that can emit a response.
Which means it can't be the Microsoft Word document I just worked on,  
since as far as I know, such things aren't capable of emitting anything.

Do I have this right?

-Alan