W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > April 2008

Re: Uniform access to descriptions

From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 22:53:52 -0400
Message-Id: <A0143510-2FE8-47DA-AB16-CE676CE16EE6@creativecommons.org>
Cc: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
To: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>


On Apr 8, 2008, at 3:35 PM, Phil Archer wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> Clearly Xiaoshu is unhappy about this and that discussion will need  
> to play out and, presumably, be taken into full account by the TAG.  
> Meanwhile, I'm willing to help create the document - but my diary  
> is pretty well full for this week and next.

Don't single out Xiaoshu as there are other dissenters as well... The  
first step is an issue summary document (focusing not on solutions  
but on use cases), and preparing that can go on in parallel with  
discussion of the merits of various solutions.

I will add to the solutions list Xiaoshu's suggestion to use CN to  
choose metadata instead of webarch-representation, with a brief  
statement of what the TAG's position has been on this idea, which  
surfaces from time to time.

> Can I suggest:
> 1. You see whether it can be put on the agenda of a TAG meeting in  
> a few weeks - a date will be a useful deadline to work to.
>
> 2. We and others (Harry? Mark N?) collaborate on the doc by either  
> editing the wiki page you've been creating on or a new one?

This sounds like a fine plan. If you're uncomfortable with the wiki  
we can use some other medium; I'm not too particular.

It would be helpful to know any deadlines you, Mark, and others are  
working under, beyond POWDER last call at the end of the month, which  
you already mentioned.

> Phil
>
> (P.S. I don't have write access to the ESW Wiki but I dare say it  
> can be arranged!)

I think you just create an account for yourself, and logged in users  
can write.
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 02:54:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:55 GMT