Alan Ruttenberg scripsit: > But the problem with "representation" is that lacking any definition > that isn't circular. I didn't think there was any trouble with "representation"; it's just a pile of bits with some metadata, most importantly a media-type. > A person can't even figure out whether its > correct or not, never mind a machine. So really, this isn't an issue > of RDF or OWL or machine understanding and verification. I can't even > get started on the machine stuff because I myself can't figure out > whether someone has done this representation thing correctly or not. Whether a representation properly represents its resource is basically a matter of fiat; it represents if (a) the owner says it does, or (b) the owner's other claims about the resource are consistent with the representation. > In RDF it is impossible to look for > errors except by staring, because it's impossible to have a machine > detect an inconsistency. Well, no worse than prose or mathematics, then. -- Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan in any language. --Allen Brown cowan@ccil.orgReceived on Sunday, 30 September 2007 06:25:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:09 GMT