On 28/09/2007 16:43, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > TimbL writes: >>> I wonder what the AWWW would look like with s/information resource/ > document/g; s/resource/thing/g > > I think it would be a *significant* improvement for all the reasons > mentioned and the perpetual discord about what it means to be an > 'information resource'. In addition, 'document' has excellent > synonymy with well-known machine-readable definitions (as well as > human-readable definitions). Although it would be confusing for resources that are images, executable binaries, mp3s, embedded flash video etc I guess they're all "digital things" as opposed to all other "things". Ian -- work - http://www.talis.com/platform play - http://iandavis.com/blog callto:ian_davisReceived on Friday, 28 September 2007 16:21:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 07:02:15 GMT