> From: Pat Hayes [mailto:phayes@ihmc.us] > [ . . . ] > But nobody said that the URI responded. Okay, my fault, I should have been more precise. > In the 200 case, what > responds is the resource Web-attached to, and denoted by (assuming > the above-mentioned convention) the URI. In the 303 case, what > initially responds is the thingie (resource?) which is Web-attached > to the URI - which the URI accesses - but which (might but more > probably) might not be denoted by it. In the 404 case, all bets are > off. Well, okay, but I'm wary of hypothesizing this thingie that is Web-attached to the URI that sends 303 responses, because it sounds confusingly similar to an "information resource". I'll explain why in my reply to Rhys. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 03:22:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 28 September 2007 03:22:13 GMT