Recommending that both are considered persistent is a choice to be made. For instance an alternative would be say to make one or the other permanent, but not both. Life is hard. Let's not make it harder. -Alan On Sep 27, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 09:43 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote: >> There's a potential Semantic Web issue here. It's obvious that the >> permanent URI would be a reasonable subject of statement, and it the >> temporary one not, unless the RDF is meant for ephemeral use. If both >> URIs are permanent, and their meaning isn't distinguished, then both >> will be used interchangeably and we have a URI alias problem. > > Yes. This is hardly news, is it? Life is hard. > > Aliases should be avoided when it's feasible, but sometimes it's > not feasible. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > >Received on Thursday, 27 September 2007 14:32:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:09 GMT