- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:49:04 -0700
- To: Mikael Nilsson <mikael@nilsson.name>
- Cc: W3C-TAG Group WG <www-tag@w3.org>
On Oct 24, 2007, at 2:48 AM, Mikael Nilsson wrote: > ons 2007-10-24 klockan 02:18 -0700 skrev Roy T. Fielding: >> Unless you can come up with a *new* argument that is not already >> found in one of the following threads >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0150.html >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2004Oct/0071.html >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Jun/0092.html >> >> then this discussion is just another waste of time. The 303 >> solution exists only for the sake of those resource owners that >> wish to make the distinction. It has no need of an agreement from >> anyone else, nor does it have any effect on Web architecture, >> and it need not be implemented by people who don't share the >> desire for such a distinction. > > How can you say that in a thread that discusses the possibility of > formalizing this distinction in a "HTTP semantics"? For the same reason that I don't believe pigs will fly, even if someone chooses to shove one out a window. > It seems to me that such a formalization *would* require people to > follow the proposal. Mmm, bacon. ....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 15:49:27 UTC