Ed Summers wrote: > On 10/23/07, Xiaoshu Wang <wangxiao@musc.edu> wrote: > >> I think you still do. You own the URI but you don't own Paris. What >> people gets back is your personal "impression" of Paris. If other >> people don't agree with your impression, they cannot use your URI to >> denote Paris. They have to mint a different one. Whoever gets right >> will be shared by more people, other URIs will die. This is the rule of >> the game. >> > > I really like this evolutionary approach to URIs and > authority--particularly in the context of the semantic web. Does > anyone know if this 'game' has been discussed or written up anywhere > before? > > //Ed > > I have written a manuscript about it but were turned down for the reason of "insufficiently mature". I am planning to rewrite it with some new thought. The basic principle is how we can develop and deploy an ontology in such that it promotes maximal sharing. I had put some part of the idea at http://www.charlestoncore.org/ont/2005/08/o3.html. I can send you my old draft manuscript if you are interested. XiaoshuReceived on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 13:49:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:10 GMT