Mikael Nilsson wrote: > It is apparent that you do not agree with this.Personally, I think this > is maybe one of the most central parts of AWWW, and could not be > emphasized enough. In any case, I don't see that the TAG has stepped > away from this position just by deemphasizing URLs. URI allocation is > still done by the owner. > I do agree this to certain extent. I do believe the URI owner's opinion should carry more weight on what the URI is. It would make a better society we use a URI in a way that is compatible with the owner of resource URI. But the issue at hand is if the URI owner (but not the resource owner) has *all* the information about the resource that the URI denotes. I think not. AWWW's definition for information resource and then httpRange-14 imply this. XiaoshuReceived on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 11:11:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:56:10 GMT