W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > May 2007

versioning definitions... [was: TAG minutes ... XMLVersioning-41 ]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 15:30:36 -0500
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1179779436.15441.149.camel@pav.dm93.org>

On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 13:21 -0700, David Orchard wrote:
>  >    DanC: I'm disappointed that the document is going in the 
> > opposite of
> >    the direction I advised, which was to integrate the 
> > definitions into
> >    the material so that they're motivated
> 
> I share the concern..  I also wonder if a standalone terminology doc
> will just be ignored as being to abstract.  BUT, if there's a push to
> make smaller docs, this is one way to do it.

Meanwhile, I was reading too fast. The definitions do seem
to have an example woven into them.

http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning 
18 May 2007

More later, I hope...


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 21 May 2007 20:30:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:47:45 GMT