W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2007

RE: (Partial) review of Versioning XML

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:35:24 -0700
Message-ID: <BEBB9CBE66B372469E93FFDE3EDC493E3908DF@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "John Cowan" <cowan@ccil.org>, "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>

That entry is a 404 because MT decided to drop the "day" from the
postings for the 4.0 beta, and I can't go back to 3.3 as I need comments
working properly and I want to try openId.

The posting can be found at
http://www.pacificspirit.com/blog/2007/04/what_do_version_identifiers_id
entify

I'm really really troubled by all my blog URIs breaking, if only for a
short time.  6 apart clearly doesn't understand "cool uris don't change"
as they break URIs in many different ways each release.  I continue to
try to help them see the light.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 4:43 PM
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: John Cowan; Norman Walsh; www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: RE: (Partial) review of Versioning XML
> 
> Dave Orchard writes:
> 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 7:31 AM
> > > To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> > > Cc: Norman Walsh; David Orchard; www-tag@w3.org
> > > Subject: Re: (Partial) review of Versioning XML
> > > 
> > 
> > > In shorter, a language is a (mathematical) set of XML documents.
> > > Note that this precludes us from talking about *the* 
> language of a 
> > > document, which I consider to be a Good Thing.
> > 
> > I think I'm rapidly getting to the same place, see one post at
> > 
> http://www.pacificspirit.com/blog/2007/04/19/what_do_version_i
> dentifiers_identify
> 
> Dave: it looks like that blog entry is 404.  In fact, I've 
> been meaning to suggest that when we reference something from 
> one of our blogs that's likely to be important to 
> understanding a TAG or other W3C discussion, I 
> think it makes sense to record a copy in the W3C archive.   I have no 
> problem with also linking the private blog copy, as that 
> makes clear the 
> context of the contribution.   I think it's pretty clear that the 
> persistence characteristics of private blogs are often not 
> nearly as good as those of resources administered by the W3C. 
>  Anyway, I'm curious to know what this posting said.  Thanks.
> 
> Noah
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 18:35:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:52 UTC