W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2007

Re: article on URIs, is this material that can be used by the

From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:36:23 +0100
Message-ID: <466FBA97.1040402@hackcraft.net>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, SWEO@spunkymail-mx6.g.dreamhost.com, IG?@spunkymail-mx6.g.dreamhost.com, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org

Dan Brickley wrote:
>> Hmm?  What _does_ a thumbnail of an JPEG (of a) photograph of the
>> Eiffel tower depict, if not the Eiffel tower?  If you show it to 1000
>> people, and as them what it is, I'll bet you all but the most
>> obstreperous geeks (and Fair Witnesses :-) will say "(a picture of)
>> the Eiffel Tower".  Are they all wrong?
> Many automatic thumbnail algorithms (eg. flickr's) cut out a square from 
> the original rectangle, and so may omit content from the original. So 
> they don't necessarily depict everything that the original depicted.

Further, anyone with the vaguest of understanding of the concept of 
"thumbnail" will understand thumbnail -> image -> Eiffel Tower.

One of the reasons thumbnails are used at all is that when even 
extremely untechnical users see them in a context where it's clear that 
they are indeed thumbnails they grok immediately that a larger image is 
available through it. If anything their mental model is closer to 
thumbnail-> image than that of techies (who might be thinking much more 
along the lines of the image->thumbnail, link->image, 
link_contents->thumbnail mappings of the implementation).
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 09:37:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:32:52 UTC